Spiritual Yearning
Project Overview:
Philosophers of religion have long examined arguments about whether God exists. Recently, however, they have begun to consider a different question: what difference would (or does) God’s existence make? Pro-theism is the view that we are better off if God exists; anti-theism is the view that we are worse off if God exists. These rival views have been defended in various ways. For example, pro-theists have argued that God would anchor morality, bring about ultimate justice, and ensure that no evil or suffering is ultimately pointless. Meanwhile, anti-theists have argued that God’s existence would compromise our freedom and privacy, and make our lives less dignified and meaningful. This topic has come to be called the axiology of theism because it concerns the value (or disvalue) that God’s existence would bring to the world and our lives.
This project will broaden and deepen this discussion by stimulating new research in three specific areas:
(1) There are underexplored connections between the axiology of theism and spiritual yearning. Pro-theism can be understood as an expression of spiritual yearning, but in what ways? Could anti-theism also express a form of yearning (e.g. for meaning or dignity) that could rightly be called ‘spiritual’? If so, why – and if not, why not?
(2) So far, there has been little discussion of how virtues and vices relate to the axiology of theism. But there is much fruitful work to be done here. For example: under what conditions can pro-theism and anti-theism (or the spiritual yearning they express) be morally or intellectually virtuous – or vicious – and why?
(3) There have been notable early efforts to diversify work in this area by expanding the scope of axiological analysis to views other than traditional monotheism, including pantheism, panentheism, polytheism, Buddhism, and traditional African religions. But there is more to be done, particularly to connect these (and other) worldviews to accounts of spiritual yearning, and to explore how such yearning might manifest virtue or vice.
Documents
Project Leaders:
- , Augustana University
- Klaas J. Kraay, 91¸£Àû
Team Members:
- (Baylor University)
- (Loyola Marymount University)
- (University of Oklahoma)
- (Morehead State University, Emeritus)
- (Valencia College)
- (St. Louis University)
- (Oxford University)
- (University of Pretoria)
- (91¸£Àû)
- (Baylor University)
Research Assistant:
tba
Call for Abstracts
Submission Deadline: December 1, 2026
Conference Dates: tba
Conference Venue: 91¸£Àû
The conference will bring together 15 scholars - including 3 chosen by anonymous review - to present work-in-progress connecting discussions of the axiology of theism and other worldviews with the virtues and vices of spiritual yearning. Workshopped papers will be published in an anthology or special issue of a journal. Chosen participants will be given $1,000 USD to defray travel and accommodation costs for attending the conference, plus a $2,000 USD honorarium upon submission of their essay for publication.
Preference will be given to submissions that focus on non-theistic or non-dominant religious/spiritual worldviews. Abstracts must make clear how the intended essays will explore connections between the axiology of a particular worldview and the virtues or vices of spiritual yearning. Applicants are encouraged to review the (PDF file) axiology of theism and other worldviews bibliography (opens in new window) , and the (PDF file) abstracts by confirmed team members (opens in new window) .
Abstracts should be 500 words or fewer, and anonymized. They should be submitted to [tba] along with a current CV, by the deadline.
Decisions will be communicated by the end of January. Questions can be directed to Leigh Vicens at lvicens@augie.edu and Klaas Kraay at kraay@torontomu.ca.
Funding and Disclaimer
This project is generously supported by the the Department of Philosophy at 91¸£Àû, and by the (which is housed at Hillsdale College and funded by Grant 63653 from the ).
The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of 91¸£Àû, Hillsdale College, or the John Templeton Foundation.